Threat intel that gets acted on, not just read.
So what does Soarcery do for CTI? Every artifact is checked against a native multi-engine verdict spread, and the full picture, where engines agree and disagree, stays intact instead of getting averaged into one score.
One verdict hides the truth.
Most tools collapse a threat into a single score and move on. Analysts either trust a black box they cannot audit, or redo the investigation from scratch, and either way the disagreement between engines, which is often the real signal, gets lost.
One score hides the split
Collapsing engines into a single number erases the disagreement, and the disagreement is often the story.
Black boxes cannot be audited
A verdict you cannot trace is a verdict you re-investigate. The tool saved nobody any time.
Intel that never becomes action
Knowing about a threat and being defended against it are separated by hours of manual plumbing that rarely happens.
The spread stays intact. Contested gets dug into.
It investigates the indicator
The Familiar pulls sender reputation, sandbox results, static analysis, and reputation checks for every artifact on a case, and keeps the evidence attached.
It scores the verdict spread
Instead of averaging engines into one number, Soarcery keeps the full spread: where they agree, and where they split beyond agreement.
It escalates the contested calls to the Seal
A tight, agreeing spread drives an automatic call within your threshold. A contested spread routes to a human at the Seal, with the full evidence already assembled.
The evidence stays on the record
Sandbox results, reputation pulls, and static analysis stay attached to the artifact, so the next analyst inherits the work instead of redoing it.
Disagreement is signal. Keep it.
This is the component the product uses on every artifact. A tight, agreeing spread drives an automatic call within your threshold. A contested one routes to a human with the evidence already assembled, because a split between engines is a reason to look closer, not a number to average away.
Illustrative. Demo data.
The call, and what produced it.
Actual product. Demo data.
The call arrives with its agreement kept visible: how many engines weighed in, how many called it, and how much confidence that actually supports. A verdict nobody can trace is a verdict your analysts will quietly redo.
Enrichment stays attached to the artifact that produced it: the emails, URLs, and hashes on the case, each one inspectable. The next analyst inherits the work instead of starting the investigation over.
Actual product. Demo data.
Intelligence your SOC can act on.
- The spread stays intact: agreement and dissent are both visible, never averaged into one number.
- Contested calls escalate to the Seal with the evidence already attached.
- It plans before it acts: the enrichment steps are visible before they run.
- Every verdict leaves a receipt: how the call was made, replayable end to end.
Where else it earns its keep.
Run it on your real indicators.
A 30-minute walkthrough on your real alerts. Watch the verdict spread, not a single collapsed score.