Black Hat USA Aug 4-6, Mandalay Bay. Book time with us
Soarcery
Watch an InvestigationRequest Demo
Choosing an approach

Three ways to automate a SOC. One honest comparison.

Playbook SOAR, AI SOC analyst tools, and agentic SOAR solve different slices of the same pain. Here is where each wins and where each breaks, including ours, plus a capability matrix against four named platforms below.

See agentic SOAR workRead the definition
Playbook SOAR
AI SOC analyst tools
Agentic SOAR
Core idea
Humans encode procedure as flowcharts; the platform executes them.
An AI investigates and summarizes alerts; humans act on the conclusions.
Agents investigate and respond; humans set the gates and approve the consequential moves.
The thinking
Stays with your analysts. Branches only cover what someone predicted.
Automated for triage. Stops at the verdict.
Automated end to end, with the reasoning shown and the evidence cited.
The acting
Automated, but rigid. Most teams disable the risky half.
Yours. The alert is summarized; the queue is still your queue.
Automated within limits you set. Reversible by preference, gated by design.
Maintenance
The permanent backlog: every tool change breaks a flow someone has to fix.
Light. Tuning prompts and integrations.
Light. Plain-language instructions instead of diagrams; agents adapt to tool drift.
Auditability
Execution logs: what fired, not why.
Varies. Summaries often without the full reasoning trail.
The receipt: every step, tool call, confidence, and approver on one replayable trail.
Where it wins
Stable, high-volume, fully predictable procedures you never want improvised.
Fast relief for triage overload without touching response.
The full loop: triage relief and the response labor, with control intact.
Honest risk
You become a playbook shop. The backlog is forever.
Labor moves from reading alerts to reading summaries.
Newer category. Demand receipts and start gated; distrust anyone who says otherwise.
Naming names

Weighing us against a specific agentic SOAR vendor?

These approach-level tradeoffs hold generally. For a capability-by-capability look against four named platforms, sourced from each vendor's own materials, here is the matrix.

Capability comparison: Soarcery against Torq, Tines, Splunk SOAR, and Cortex XSOAR
Capability Soarcery Torq Tines Splunk SOAR Cortex XSOAR
Agent investigates the caseReasons through the full case itself, not just executing a pre-built procedure Full Partial13 Partial910 None1617 None24
Plan shown before automation runsA reviewable plan is the default step before anything executes Full Partial12 Partial11 None18 None24
Approval gate is the shipped defaultConsequential actions wait on human approval without extra configuration Full Partial3 Partial11 None1620 None24
Audit trail ties reasoning to the approverEvidence, reasoning, and who approved it live on one replayable record Full Full34 Partial1213 Partial1920 Full2425
No flowchart to maintainAutomation described in plain language, not hand-drawn and rebuilt per tool change Full Partial1 Partial89 None1718 None2428
Connector library proven at scaleBreadth of integrations already running in production today Partial Full2 Full8 Full16 Full2426
Enterprise-scale deployment historyNamed large-enterprise customers running the platform today None Full25 Full8 Full21 Full2628
Published self-serve pricingA list price visible without a sales conversation None None67 Full14 None22 None29
Full Full support, confirmed by the vendor's own materials Partial Partial or conditional, one of several modes, or configurable rather than default None Not offered today, disabled by default, or announced but not yet shipped
Where each still wins

To be fair to four platforms with real scale behind them.

  • Torq: a materially larger connector library today, 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus proven enterprise deployment history at named large-enterprise customers.25
  • Tines: the most transparent pricing in this comparison, a published pricing page with a genuine free Community tier before a prospect ever talks to sales.14
  • Splunk SOAR: a large, mature connector library (300+ tools, 2,800+ actions) with deep integration into Splunk Enterprise Security and the backing of Cisco.1621
  • Cortex XSOAR: a large, verified content marketplace, a practitioner community of more than 20,000 incident responders, and mature Threat Intel Management that ties intel to incidents in real time.2627

Fair fight

Soarcery is a newer platform. It has not run yet at the enterprise scale, connector-library size, or ecosystem maturity of Torq, Tines, Splunk SOAR, or Cortex XSOAR, and that gap is real. If your SOC already runs on a deep library of playbooks or workflows built on one of these platforms, migrating away from that investment has a real cost. Soarcery is the better fit when what you want is one agent that reasons through a full Investigation end to end, a native multi-engine verdict spread informing that reasoning, and an approval gate that is the default behavior, not a setting someone has to remember to configure.

Settle it with evidence

Watch the difference on a real case.

Three minutes, ungated. Then bring your own alerts and compare for real.

Watch an InvestigationRequest Demo
Sources

Where this comparison comes from.

Every claim about Torq, Tines, Splunk SOAR, and Cortex XSOAR above traces back to one of these, almost entirely each vendor's own site and product pages, confirmed by direct fetch where noted.

  1. 1Torq, "Socrates: Agentic AI in the SOC", torq.io/socrates. Orchestration model, "agentic quarterback" quote, Agentic Builder natural-language workflow generation, "reducing but not eliminating" the workflow-authoring step.
  2. 2Torq, "The Torq AI SOC Platform", torq.io/ai-soc-platform. "Close Over 90% of Security Cases. Autonomously," 300 pre-built integrations, 4,000+ pre-built steps, Universal Auto Triage, customer logos.
  3. 3Torq, "Torq HyperAgents", torq.io/hyperagents. Context Graph and memory, "dial, not a switch," "every reasoning step, every verdict, and every action is logged," human-on-the-loop reviews.
  4. 4Torq, "Torq Case Management: Built for Enterprise-Scale SOCs", torq.io/blog/torq-enterprise-case-management. "Low-confidence cases can be auto-closed or merged; high-confidence cases are escalated with full context attached," "every state change is logged." Confirmed by direct fetch.
  5. 5Torq homepage, torq.io. Headline and customer logos, including named large-enterprise customers.
  6. 6Torq, demo request page, torq.io/demo. No public list pricing page found, engagement is sales-gated.
  7. 7Torq Knowledge Base, "AI Pricing Model: Monitor and Track AI Credit Consumption", kb.torq.io. AI Credits usage-based pricing layer on top of the base contract.
  8. 8Tines homepage, tines.com. "The intelligent workflow platform" tagline, three workflow modes, Storyboard, Workbench, and Cases, customer logos including named large-enterprise customers.
  9. 9Tines, "Tines Workbench, AI chat for secure workflow automation", tines.com/platform/workbench. Workbench and Cases description, AI chat interface definition, "Create flows at the speed of conversation," built-in confirmation, audit, and RBAC controls.
  10. 10Tines, "Agents" platform page, tines.com/platform/agents. Agents definition, Task Mode and Chat Mode, autonomy-and-control framing.
  11. 11PR Newswire, "Tines Launches Agents to Deliver Full-Spectrum Workflow Automation" (June 25, 2025), prnewswire.com. Three-mode autonomy spectrum, data security claims.
  12. 12Tines, "Security at Tines", tines.com/security. Audit log claim, SOC 2 Type II, annual audits, data retention philosophy.
  13. 13Tines blog, "Agentic Workflows: What they are and how to govern them", tines.com/blog. Agent and workflow relationship definition, audit and governance requirements, entitlement scoping. Confirmed by direct fetch.
  14. 14Tines, "Pricing", tines.com/pricing. Community free tier details, Business and Enterprise custom tiers.
  15. 15Tines blog, "Tines sets the AI governance standard with ISO 42001, 27001, and 27701", tines.com/blog, plus tines.com/security for SOC 2 Type II and the Trust Center.
  16. 16Splunk, "Splunk SOAR", splunk.com/en_us/products/splunk-security-orchestration-and-automation.html. "300+ third-party tools and 2,800+ automated actions," "execute actions across security and IT tools in seconds instead of hours," prebuilt playbooks aligned to MITRE ATT&CK and D3FEND.
  17. 17Splunk, "Splunk SOAR Features", splunk.com/en_us/products/splunk-security-orchestration-and-automation-features.html. "Whether you're new to coding or a Python expert, Splunk SOAR provides you with the means to create and customize playbooks. The Visual Playbook Editor simplifies the playbook creation process by allowing you to assemble custom workflows with prebuilt code blocks and action strings."
  18. 18Cisco, "Cisco Elevates the SOC with Agentic AI...", September 9, 2025, newsroom.cisco.com. "AI Playbook Authoring: Translates natural language intent into functional, tested SOAR playbooks," and that this and related capabilities "will be available in 2026."
  19. 19Splunk docs, "Download audit trail logs in Splunk SOAR (Cloud)", help.splunk.com. Audit trail downloadable as CSV and accessible via the REST API. Confirmed by direct fetch.
  20. 20Splunk docs, "Enable and download audit trail logs in Splunk SOAR (On-premises)", help.splunk.com. "By default, all audit tracking in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) is disabled." Confirmed by direct fetch.
  21. 21Cisco, "Cisco Completes Acquisition of Splunk", March 18, 2024, newsroom.cisco.com. Approximately $28 billion in equity value; Splunk now part of Cisco.
  22. 22Splunk, "Cybersecurity pricing FAQs", splunk.com/en_us/products/pricing/faqs/cyber-security.html. Workload pricing "does not currently apply to Splunk SOAR"; no public list pricing for SOAR, engagement is sales-led.
  23. 23Palo Alto Networks, "Cortex XSOAR" datasheet landing, paloaltonetworks.com/resources/datasheets/cortex-xsoar. "Cortex XSOAR helps simplify security operations by unifying automation, case management, real-time collaboration and threat intel management."
  24. 24Palo Alto Networks, "Cortex XSOAR" product page, paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/cortex-xsoar. "Visual playbook editor for code-free automation," "900+ prebuilt integration and automation packs," "90% reduction in remediation time," "75% fewer incidents requiring manual interaction," "machine learning to aid analysts," "auto-documentation for knowledge sharing and audit reporting."
  25. 25Palo Alto Networks, "Incident Case Management", paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/incident-case-management. "Each incident is associated with a war room where analysts can do investigations and collaborate in real time," "all actions performed by playbooks or analysts are auto-documented," "designed for security incident responders." Confirmed by direct fetch.
  26. 26Palo Alto Networks, "Cortex XSOAR Marketplace", paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/cortex-xsoar/marketplace. "The only SOAR platform that verifies all free and paid third-party content in the marketplace to be safe for immediate use," community of more than 20,000 incident responders.
  27. 27Palo Alto Networks, "Threat Intel Management", paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/threat-intel-management. XSOAR TIM "ties threat information to incidents in real-time, and automates the distribution of your threat intelligence at scale."
  28. 28Palo Alto Networks, "Palo Alto Networks Unveils Cortex AgentiX...", October 28, 2025, paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2025. "As the next generation of Cortex XSOAR, AgentiX...", "Cortex AgentiX is available today in Cortex Cloud and Cortex XSIAM. Cortex XDR and the standalone AgentiX platform will be available in early 2026."
  29. 29Palo Alto Networks, "Cortex XSOAR 8 FAQs: Licensing and Pricing", docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com. User-based licensing; no public list pricing, sold through Palo Alto Networks and resellers.